=-= Topic for #deegree is “Welcome to deegree, an OSGeo project. Visit the main project page at http://deegree.org and our wiki at http://wiki.deegree.org with lots of extra info. Check out a running system at http://demo.deegree.org and follow us on twitter @deegree_org.” =-= Topic for #deegree was set by jmays on 10. November 2010 15:03:31 -->| copierrj (~chatzilla@83.247.8.136) has joined #deegree -->| segoerke (574f5926@gateway/web/freenode/ip.87.79.89.38) has joined #deegree Hello all togehter! > Hi:) Welcome! Nice to see you! > hi -->| bretschneider (574f5926@gateway/web/freenode/ip.87.79.89.38) has joined #deegree Todays agenda is here http://wiki.deegree.org/deegreeWiki/TmcMeeting/TmcMeeting20140710 > who's creating the irc log? we all! I will copy it and add it to the wiki page after the end of the meeting > great! Any news from Stephan? > he didn't respond to my mail > and I wasn't in this channel yesterday @14:00h me neither! > Nothin was said here yesterday:) So, shall we wait for a couple of minutes? > i'm trying to contact him using Skype Thanks -->| StephanR (~StephanR@ip-5-146-117-85.unitymediagroup.de) has joined #deegree Hello Stephan! > Hello Everybody > hi > hi OK can we start? > think so, markus is not going to join us Good Todays agenda is here http://wiki.deegree.org/deegreeWiki/TmcMeeting/TmcMeeting20140710 anything to add? > nothing from me (besides correcting the data) done ;-) > tjx > thx before we start I would like to ask who can do the merge of the pull request? > i can do that thanks! I will write the meeting minutes > ok > shall I ask for votes? Yes, let's start with the pull requests for 3.4 > Sure > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/323 > -1 (travis error) -1 (due to merge conflict) > -1 (travis error) any one else with an opinion? > for now: not merging (-3) Result: -3. Not merging (for now). Next one please > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/322 > hmm, build is still in progress > ok, just finished right > +1 wait please +1 > +1 > merged (+3) Result: +3. Merging. > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/318 +1 > 0 > 0 > merged Result: +1. Merging. > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/311 > +1 +1 > +1 Result: +3. Merging. > merged > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/310 > +1 +1 > +1 Result: +3. Merging. > merged > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/308 Paul999, anything you would like to say? > tfr42: I havent much to add, I think the PR description tells most of what the issue is Is it a bug fix or an enhancement? > +1 (suggested behavior is mandated by the standard) > I see it as a bug > because it doesn't return all records with the current code > potentially > btw: the wfs currently has the same (non complient) behavior +1 > +1 Result: +3. Merging. > Thanks:) You are welcome! > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/300 Thanks a lot for your contribution > +1 > +1 Well, we had a lenghtly discussion on this pull request any open question? > yes, i think we resolved all issues OK +1 > it is tested and all fixes are part of the pull > +1 Result: +3. Merging. > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/211 > -1 > build failure -1 (travis build error) > -1 (Travis Error) Result: -3. Not merging (for now). > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/320 OK Then let's move over to 3.3.11 https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/issues?milestone=21&state=open shows the open pull requests > what about 320? for 3.4? > yes correct that is for 3.4 -1 due to build errors > (and we have another one) > -1 (remark: only oracle jdk build failed) > -1 (travis build error) Result: -3. Not merging (for now). > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/299 > +1 > +1 0 (it is still not formatted in deegree style) Result: +2. Merging. > do we have a policy in place how to deal which formatting? sure https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/wiki/Developer-guidelines see "Source code formatting in Eclipse" something similar for InteliJ IDEA or others IDE's is missing contributions are welcome > perhaps we should descibe the style in the wiki > someday > switching to 3.3 pulls Yep! > k > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/319 -1 (build error) > -1 > -1 (build error) > again a failure in oraclejdk7 only > remarkable Result: -3. Not merging (for now). > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/309 > +1 +1 > +1 Result: +3. Merging. > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/307 > +1 +1 > +1 Result: +3. Merging. > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/298 > +1 > ?? > +1 > +1 +1 Result: +4 (+3 binding votes). Merging. > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/229 > +1 > +1 +1 Result: +3. Merging. > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/215 > -1 -1 > -1 (build error) Result: -3. Not merging (for now). > do we still need input on the nature of the bug / fix > ? Yes I will add a comment after the meeting > ok > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/209 > -1 -1 > -1 (build error) Result: -3. Not merging (for now). > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/321 > build in progress > and we didn't merge the 3.4 pull > -1 > -1 we should postpone this pull -1 Result: -3. Not merging (for now). > that was the last one OK, thanks a lot! > we do seem to have other pulls without milestone Which? > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/317 That is a new feature should be for 3.4 only IMO > agreed Any other opinion? > -1 -1 > -1 > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/316 Result: -3. Not merging (for now). > also without milestone > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/315 > same path 3.4 and 3.3 > patch OK, I added the milestones > +1 (both pulls) +1 (for both too) > +1 (for both) Result: +3. Merging.(both!) > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/314 > +1 +1 > +1 Result: +3. Merging. > https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/313 > +1 > +1 +1 Result: +3. Merging. > missed this 3.3 one: https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/pull/312 > +1 +1 > +1 Result: +3. Merging. > think we got them all! > 9 pull request remain open > 8 Well, some do need further explainations I will ask Diego for more input > we should invesigate some build issues yes. could you do this and add your findings as a comment to each pull request? > unfortunately not that soon > i'm somewhat busy atm any other volunteers? Well, then I will make a issue in our github tracker and assign it to the TMC And we will see later who can work on this OK? > ok > ok Thanks Then let's shortly talk about the code sprint > ok I have added a new wiki page https://github.com/deegree/deegree3/wiki/Berlin_CodeSprint_20140807-08 with all information Everyone is invited to register him_herself over doodle http://doodle.com/yz23w3b97vw37ayx > done For how long shall we keep that registration from open? For how long shall we keep that registration form (sorry) open? > do we have a number of participants limit > ? Well, I do need to know how many people will attend to find a room My favorite called "Tante Renate" has a limit at about 8 people Shall I ask via the mailing list to register be the end of next week? > seams reasonable Other comments or questions on this topic? If not, then I think we are done for today > how about sponsors? > could you indicate how much is needed? I will ask FOSSGIS e.v. > ok costs depends on the location. But everyone can ask for sponsoring I you have someone in mind, please ask > ok > btw: who's going to do the release builds > I have a last question, do you have any idea/planning when 3.3.11 will be released? I will give it a try > great! keep your fingers crossed!!! Excellent! I think we are done? Thanks a lot and talk to you soon... > great! CU! cu and have a nice day > cu